Posts

KILUSANG MAYO UNO vs. NEDA Case Digest

CASE DIGEST KILUSANG MAYO UNO vs.  NEDA  Case Digest G.R. No. 167798, April 19, 2006 BAYAN MUNA vs. ERMITA Case Digest G.R. No. 167930, April 19, 2006 FACTS: EO 420, issued by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on 13 April 2005, required all government agencies and government-owned and controlled corporations to streamline and harmonize their Identification (ID) systems. Under said EO, all government agencies and government-owned and controlled corporations were ordered to adopt a uniform data collection and format for their existing identification (ID) systems. Herein petitioners, sought to enjoin the Director-General from implementing the said EO alleging that it is unconstitutional because it constitutes usurpation of legislative functions by the executive branch of the government and infringes on the citizen’s right to privacy. Thus, filing these two consolidated petitions for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, s...
Post a Comment
Read more

PEOPLE vs. AYCARDO

CASE DIGEST PEOPLE vs. AYCARDO Case Digest G.R. No. 218114, JUNE 5, 2017 (PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. SALVADOR AYCARDO) FACTS: Sometime in September 2007, AAA was in a room inside the house of accused-appellant, when the latter entered, attempted to remove her shorts and panties and tried to insert his finger into her vagina. Accused-appellant failed to undress AAA because she resisted his advances, but accused-appellant was able to touch her vagina with his finger. AAA then ran to the house of her cousin Joy. Later in the evening that same day, accused-appellant came by to fetch her. Thus, returned to accused-appellant’s house where she prepared supper as instructed and had dinner with accused-appellant. In the middle of the night, AAA was roused from her sleep when she felt somebody removing her panties and shorts, who turned out to be accused-appellant. AAA resisted but accused-appellant told her he would do it slowly. Accused-appellant then undressed and insert...
Post a Comment
Read more

LEE vs. CA Case Digest

RAMON C. LEE and ANTONIO DM. LACDAO vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, SACOBA MANUFACTURING CORP., PABLO GONZALES, JR. and THOMAS GONZALES LEE vs. CA (Case Digest) G.R. No. 93695, February 4, 1992 FACTS: A complaint for a sum of money was filed by the International Corporate Bank, Inc. against the private respondents who, in turn, filed a third party complaint against ALFA and the petitioners. The trial court issued an order requiring the issuance of an   alias   summons upon ALFA through the DBP as a consequence of the petitioner's letter informing the court that the summons for ALFA was erroneously served upon them considering that the management of ALFA had been transferred to the DBP. The DBP claimed that it was not authorized to receive summons on behalf of ALFA since the DBP had not taken over the company which has a separate and distinct corporate personality and existence. Subsequently, the trial court issued an order advising the private respond...
Post a Comment
Read more